Tag Archive | "manchester city"

Premier League live games announced by Sky TV

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Premier League live games announced by Sky TV

Posted on 06 July 2010 by Ben Greenwood

Premier League Football on Sky Sports HDSky have announced the games they’ve chosen to be shown on Sky Sports for the first half of the season. The first batch of 115 live games next season sees, unsurprisingly, Tottenham Hotspur resume last season’s rivalry with Manchester City on Saturday 14th August, live on Sky Sports 2 and Sky Sports HD2.

Ford Super Sunday will feature Liverpool versus Arsenal from Anfield on Sky Sports 1 and Sky Sports HD1, while the first Monday Night Football welcomes Newcastle United back to the Premier League as they visit Manchester United at Old Trafford, also on Sky Sports 1 and Sky Sports HD1.

Not a bad weekend of football, especially for High Definition viewers.

FULL LIVE SKY SPORTS FIXTURES

DATE GAME KICK-OFF
AUGUST
Saturday 14 Tottenham v Man City 12.45pm
Sunday 15 Liverpool v Arsenal 4pm
Monday 16 Man Utd v Newcastle 8pm
Saturday 21 Wigan v Chelsea 5.15pm
Sunday 22 Fulham v Man Utd 4pm
Monday 23 Man City v Liverpool 8pm
Saturday 28 Blackburn v Arsenal 12.45pm
Sunday 29 Bolton v Birmingham
Aston Villa v Everton
1.30pm
4pm
SEPTEMBER
Sunday 12 Everton v Man Utd
Birmingham v Liverpool
1.30pm
4pm
Monday 13 Stoke City v Aston Villa 8pm
Saturday 18 Stoke City v West Ham 12.45pm
Sunday 19 Man Utd v Liverpool
Chelsea v Blackpool
1.30pm
4pm
Saturday 25 Man City v Chelsea 12.45pm
Sunday 26 Wolves v Aston Villa
Newcastle v Stoke City
2pm
4.10pm
OCTOBER
Sunday 3 Chelsea v Arsenal 4pm
Monday 4 Wigan v Wolves 8pm
Sunday 17 Everton v Liverpool
Blackpool v Man City
1.30pm
4pm
Monday 18 Blackburn v Sunderland 8pm
Saturday 23 Tottenham v Everton
West Ham v Newcastle
12.45pm
5.30pm
Sunday 24 Stoke City v Man Utd
Man City v Arsenal
1.30pm
4pm
Sunday 31 Bolton v Liverpool
Newcastle v Sunderland
1.30pm
4pm
NOVEMBER
Monday 1 Blackpool v West Brom 8pm
Saturday 6 Bolton v Tottenham 12.45pm
Sunday 7 Arsenal v Newcastle
Liverpool v Chelsea
1.30pm
4pm
Tuesday 9 West Ham v West Brom 8pm
Wednesday 10 Man City v Man Utd 8pm
Saturday 13 Aston Villa v Man Utd 12.45pm
Sunday 14 Everton v Arsenal
Chelsea v Sunderland
2pm
4.10pm
Sunday 21 Arsenal v Tottenham
Fulham v Man City
1.30pm
4pm
Monday 22 Sunderland v Everton 8pm
Saturday 27 Aston Villa v Arsenal 12.45pm
Sunday 28 Newcastle v Chelsea
Tottenham v Liverpool
1.30pm
4pm

View Comments

Premier League fixtures released

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Premier League fixtures released

Posted on 17 June 2010 by Ben Greenwood

The Premier League fixture list for the 2010/2011 season has been released and sees champions Chelsea host newly promoted West Brom at Stamford Bridge on the opening day, Saturday 14th August.

Bloomfield RoadThat’ll make for a nice return to the top division for West Brom. The same goes for Championship champions Newcastle, who travel to Old Trafford for a reunion with Manchester United while Blackpool get their first ever taste of Premier League action at home against Wigan. The Tangerines will be well pleased with the tie at Bloomfield Road as it gives them a great chance of getting some points on the board early.

The tie of the opening weekend is undoubtedly Arsenal versus Liverpool at Anfield. Liverpool, presumably with a new manager in place, will look to get off to a good start to provide the foundation for a more successful season than last year but they won’t find it easy against Arsene Wenger’s men. Expect this one to move to the Sunday for Sky coverage.

The two teams that battled it out for fourth place last season, Tottenham and Manchester City, get to resume their rivalry early as City travel to White Hart Lane in a potentially mouthwatering clash that could also be chosen by Sky.

Premier League Opening Day Fixtures

  • Aston Villa v West Ham
  • Blackburn v Everton
  • Blackpool v Wigan
  • Bolton v Fulham
  • Chelsea v West Brom
  • Liverpool v Arsenal
  • Man Utd v Newcastle
  • Sunderland v Birmingham
  • Tottenham v Man City
  • Wolves v Stoke

Full club-by-club season fixtures here.

View Comments

James Milner

Tags: , , ,

James Milner: A £20m+ Gamble

Posted on 21 May 2010 by Ben Greenwood

You’ll guess from the headline that we’re not as impressed with the talents of Aston Villa’s James Milner as some appear to be but you shouldn’t read that as us thinking he’s not a good player. He is, and has proved it over the last couple seasons for his club. He’s also very versatile, able to play right across the midfield and, on occasion, in either full back position.

James Milner

But in a transfer market where David Villa can be bought for £34 million and Barcelona are rumoured to want Cesc Fabregas for upwards of 45 million Euros, is he really two thirds the player Villa is? Or half a Fabregas? We don’t think so. Not even close. Not yet.

We’re baffled, then, by the £20m bid from Manchester City. We understand Aston Villa’s decision to reject it. They know Manchester City have an almost bottomless pit of wealth, thanks to their mega-rich benefactors, and they will try to squeeze as much out of them as they can – assuming Milner decides to leave, of course.

Chelsea are rumoured to be preparing to enter the bidding as well, backed by their own mega-rich benefactor, Roman Abramovic. With that sort of interest you can see the price for Milner approaching the £30m mark easily.

Even though English players come at a premium that figure is staggering for a player who just isn’t what you would term world class as yet.

Milner’s career started at Leeds United. He made his debut in 2002 at just at 16, then the youngest to appear in the Premiership. He then became the youngest to score in the Premiership until Everton’s James Vaughan broke that record. When the Yorkshire side went into decline and financial trouble, Milner was sold to Newcastle, where’d he’d make over 100 appearances.

A loan spell to Aston Villa – Milner didn’t enjoy life under Graeme Souness – looked like it would result in a transfer but the move failed and he returned to Newcastle, now managed by Glenn Roeder. In 2008 he handed in a written transfer request and was finally signed by Aston Villa for £12m.

That figure makes today’s asking price seem reasonable, perhaps. But we thought back then it was a lot of money.

However, Milner has flourished under Martin O’Neill, justifying that transfer fee to some extent. Whether on the left wing or in central midfield, Milner’s style of play makes him a great team player who provides valuable and frequent assists. Already an established international under-21 player, he has now progressed to the full England team and looks set to play an important role at this year’s World Cup in South Africa for Fabio Capello. Especially if Gareth Barry, his former team mate at Villa, fails to win his battle for fitness.

It sounds like we just made the case for a £20m plus transfer fee, doesn’t it. But we haven’t. We acknowledge that Milner is a good, good player. For us, though, a player commanding a fee of such size should be a proven international and appeared regularly in European competition. Milner doesn’t fit that bill – yet.

Youth also plays a part in setting your value and at 24 Milner is the right age, with his best years just around the corner. We assume that’s what Manchester City and Chelsea are prepared to gamble on – that he will get better over the next three or four seasons and become that proven international in the process. Hell of a gamble at that price though.

What this does prove is that we were right when we said that Manchester City’s failure to get into the Champions League would mean they’d have to set their sights lower than they would have liked in the transfer market. As good as Milner may become, we don’t think he was the man they had in mind when they were winning the race for the last Champions League spot. City would have been looking to the European mainland, to Italy, Spain and Germany.

Instead, they’re having to settle for a homegrown talent that hasn’t reached his potential yet. We hate to say we told you so, but…

Chelsea’s alleged interest is a little stranger. They do have the clout and the money to buy whoever they like. Champions of England, recent Champions League finalists, Double winners, packed with talent already – they should be a club any player in Europe with ambitions to win things would want to join. Yet here they are, looking to get into a bidding war for a player not yet proven outside of the Premiership.

A gamble for both clubs but one that could pay off. We do know this though – both clubs will be hoping to get him to sign before the World Cup kicks off. Because if he goes to South Africa and has the tournament of his life you can bet Martin O’Neill will be rejecting bids of £30m in July. And should that happen, we’ll quite happily accept that it’s no longer a gamble.

View Comments

Tottenham Hotspur clinch Champions League spot

Tags: , , , , ,

Spurs clinch Champions League spot – what now for Man City?

Posted on 06 May 2010 by Ben Greenwood

In the end the better team won the match and deservedly claimed the final Champions League spot by finishing fourth in the Premier League.

Tottenham Hotspur clinch Champions League spot

Crouch goal enough to beat Man City

Tottenham Hotspur, under Harry Redknapp, have looked a quality side this season and this is just reward for their – and his – hard work. At the risk of coming over all hypocritical following yesterday’s article lambasting clubs for targeting a fourth place finish, Sporting Fare is well pleased for Spurs and Harry. And at the bigger risk of angering Manchester City supporters, we’re equally pleased they didn’t qualify for the Champions League.

Let’s get the negatives out of the way. As we said in yesterday’s piece, the fact that a club with the amount of money City have aimed only for fourth grated on us. You aim low, you get low. City, as many Manchester United fans will take great joy in telling you, consistently find a way to fail, so it beggars belief that targeting anything but the title is deemed worth the risk.

Mark Hughes was sacked because the club’s billionaire owners felt he wouldn’t take the club up to fourth. Mancini was then presumably hired to deliver just that. He’s failed – will he get the boot too? Time will tell, though it would be harsh on the Italian. At the end of the day, the squad put together by Hughes wasn’t good enough and Mancini could only work with what he had. He certainly hasn’t had enough time or opportunity to put his own mark on it.

But stop for a moment. Was the appointment of a relatively green coach in Mancini all that ambitious in itself? Surely a club with the riches of Manchester City could have attracted a bigger, more successful and more experienced manager? It smacks of settling for second best.

Spurs, on the other hand, are aiming high. Their sights are now firmly set on grabbing third from bitter rivals Arsenal and you can bet next season Harry will have his men shooting for the stars – the Premier League title and the Champions League. So let’s leave Spurs to celebrate for now.

Where does this leave City? With no Champions League football they will be hard pressed to attract football’s biggest names. No matter how much money you offer, that fact will always be a consideration – except for the real mercenaries in the game, and they are unlikely to be the sort you want to sign to help you achieve your aims (see Robinho for example).

Spurs will now have the money – and the appeal – to strengthen their squad. Manchester United, Arsenal and without doubt Chelsea will all add players after the World Cup to increase their grip on the top three spots. City will find it difficult to match them in the transfer market.

Yes, they will no doubt spend big again in the summer but will the quality of players they are able to bring in be good enough to overhaul the likes of Tottenham et al? The evidence so far suggests not and they are going to find it more and more difficult each season.

Their Arab owners may begin to question the wisdom of their investment as well and if they decide to pull out City will find themselves sliding to the wrong end of the table.

Last night’s result was a bitter blow for a club aiming to become one of England and Europe’s best – but we can’t help feeling they didn’t aim high enough when it mattered. They will pay a heavy price for that lack of ambition. Around £200m so far and counting in fact. It may take another £200m based on what we’ve seen this season.

Back to Harry Redknapp. Sporting Fare are huge fans of his. It’s great to see an ‘old school’ manager doing well and Harry, at 62, has waited a long time to pit his not inconsiderable managerial skills against the best in Europe.  As he said himself:

“I know I’m good at my job. You don’t last 1,100 games in management if you’re a mug. People didn’t keep me just because the chairman liked me. Most of them actually probably didn’t like me.”

Harry Redknapp

Thumbs up for Redknapp

Very true, and many don’t like him. But you can’t dismiss his achievements. We’re looking forward to seeing how he does in the Champions League.

Redknapp, along with Wenger, Ferguson and Hodgson, is a good example to young up and coming managers. Managers like Mancini for example. They would do well take note of how these managers go about their business, there’s a lot to learn.

Not least that if you don’t aim for the very top you’ll never reach it.

View Comments

Manchester City v Spurs

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Battle for fourth is a sad state of affairs

Posted on 05 May 2010 by Ben Greenwood

Remember when you were a kid, kicking a ball about with your mates on the park, using jumpers for goalposts, playing fly keeper if you were a few ‘men’ short and not worrying too much about sidelines? Of course you do.

Remember pretending to be your footballing hero and dreaming of lifting the FA Cup or the First Division title? Of course you do.

Remember thinking you weren’t quite good enough for that, but were happily consoled by the fact you’d probably finish fourth in the League and claim a lucrative place in the European Cup? Of course you don’t!

Manchester City v Spurs

Aim higher or prepare to fail!

Yet as Manchester City prepare to face Tottenham Hotspur at home tonight in what is effectively a play off for that now coveted fourth spot the anticipation and excitement is palpable amongst both sets of fans. Sporting Fare sees that as the most telling sign that football has lost its way.

That a fourth place finish in the Premier League is a target for clubs is a horrible situation. That the only real reason for it is money is even more horrible. Sure, the supporters of whichever club finishes fourth will tell you there is pride in breaking the near decade long monopoly held by Manchester United, Arsenal, Liverpool and Chelsea, but that isn’t really true.

Everton did it most recently, for one brief season. They entered the Champions League qualifying round, earned a small fortune and, presumably, basked in the glory of it all briefly. But in the end, it hasn’t actually helped them progress. David Moyes has done a wonderful job at Goodison and long may he reign there, but surely the target has to be winning the League, not just qualifying for the Champions League and earning a mint?

The argument, we’re sure, will go that most clubs cannot compete with the financial might of Chelsea and to a lesser extent Manchester United and that is undoubtedly true. But that shouldn’t stop you trying! And if, at the end of a long hard season, you HAVE qualified for the Champions League and are set to earn a wedge that may help you compete better the following season then that’s the icing.

It shouldn’t be the cake.

Manchester City, of course, don’t need Champions League qualification for money. They are the richest club in the world and suffer in the transfer market only due to their lack of success over the last few decades. The ability to offer Champions League football next season will help them no end in that regard. Yet they have publicly stated that this was their aim from the start of the season. What, that’s it?

The richest club in the world is aiming to finish fourth in their league? What’s up with that? They, like everyone else, should be going for the title, even if it does appear out of reach.

We’re willing to bet that if you asked Harry Redknapp, who himself has done a fantastic job at White Hart Lane, if finishing fourth was his target he’d say no. He’d say winning the League was his target – but it’s a building job, and while he may not think it’s likely, it will be his aim, because you have to aim high to achieve.

Fourth place and July football in the Champions League is not, in our opinion, high. It’s adequate. The very reason that Manchester United, Arsenal, Chelsea and Liverpool have been the top four for so long is that they all aim to win the League (and the Champions League). None of them would have been or are satisfied with fourth.

Except, of course, Liverpool recently. And look what’s happened to them.

So…as City and Spurs do battle tonight for that less than impressive achievement we hope they begin to realise that you need to aim higher to achieve real success. Settle for second best (or fourth best) and that is all you’re ever likely to get.

View Comments

Advertise Here
Advertise Here

Recent Fare

Twitter Fare

sportingfare

93 | 178