Arsenal 2-3 Tottenham – Has the balance of power shifted in North London?

Rafael Van Der VaartToday will go down as a memorable one for Tottenham Hotspur fans. A first win at Arsenal in 17 years, a 45 minute comeback from 2-0 down at half time and a possible shift in power in North London.

That was the question asked in commentary at the end of the game anyway.The answer is no, there’s not been a shift in power. For that to happen Arsenal would have to be falling back, and they’re not. Spurs, however, are very much on a par now, or close to it. What Harry Redknapp has done is assemble a squad of good quality players and moulded them into a team of true class. He has done what Arsene Wenger has been doing for so many years at Arsenal in fact.

It can only be good for London and the Premier League. A rivalry down South of the type enjoyed by Northern clubs – Manchester United and City and Liverpool and Everton in particular – is needed and fantastic. It’s been too long. Arsenal now know they have a true local rivalry. The battles with Chelsea are just not the same.

Redknapp crafted a victory today of huge significance and Wenger must now be worrying about the often raised fragility of his team and squad. They are a hugely talented bunch but they lack a certain steel that Spurs DO possess. They have for a few years. But that’s Wenger’s way. He prefers skill over power now – despite having several very large men in his squad, they aren’t a patch on the likes of Patrick Vieira.

Spurs have mixed the skills of van der Vaart and Modric with the relative power of Huddlestone, Gallas and Kaboul. It’s proving to be a most potent mix. But on their day, Arsenal are still the better side. Today, for 45 minutes, they weren’t, bit over the course of 38 games, yes, they are still the better team. I still thik the Gunners will finish above Spurs – but it would no longer surprise me if it didn’t happen.

Awhile back Redknapp claimed he was two players away from the title. He might well be right. A proper, goal scoring striker and a defender slightly better than he has already is all he really needs. January should be interesting. There’s no doubting his ability to spot and get a talent.

The balance of power hasn’t shifted. But it’s far more equally shared now. That is down to Redknapp.

Harry Redknapp – A Manager’s Knight In Shining Armour

Harry Redknapp

Redknapp 1-0 FA - dodgy goal though...

Premier League managers have a new rebel hero, Harry Redknapp. The FA chose not to punish the Tottenham manager after his post-match comments about Manchester United’s second goal on Saturday. The decision is sure to set a new precedent for FA ruling on disparaging comments made in televised interviews.

The FA threatened to discipline Redknapp after he described Nani’s baffling goal, as a ‘farce’. The Manchester United winger blatantly handled the ball in a 2-0 win over Spurs leaving the Tottenham boss outraged. But they don’t call him a wheeler dealer for nothing. Redknapp put the FA in an uncompromising position by threatening to put a stop to doing post-match interviews.

“Don’t expect me to come out on the TV anymore and speak to the press after the game because I won’t,” he said.

The FA has made bewildering decision themselves in the past dishing out fines to managers and players alike for post match comments.

“We shouldn’t be dragged out onto TV four minutes after the game. I’m getting pulled out there by Simon the press officer to go on TV – I don’t want to go on TV, I’d much rather stay in the dressing room with the players.

The FA seemed to have been backed into a corner and decided against any sanction on Redknapp. It’s difficult to see where the football bigwigs go next on future ruling, will post-match interviews be delayed slightly? Will there be more lenience over manager’s comments in the future?  Report suggests that Redknapp’s threat had no bearing on the FA’s decision to only warn Redknapp over his future conduct

It is sure to leave a wry smile on the faces of football managers up and down the country. For once it seems the FA made the right decision, to some degree, thanks to Redknapp’s common sense.

Aidan Donovan is copywriter for a company that sells vehicle tracking system devices.

Harry Redknapp’s career plans

Harry Redknapp

‘Arry has signed a new contract with Tottenham Hotspur and will now remain their manager until 2013. The question I have is – would he have signed it if Fabio Capello wasn’t retained by the FA until after the 2012 European Championships?

The answer, I reckon, is no. He would have thrown his hat in the ring for the England managers job and waited to see what the outcome of that would have been.

That Capello remains manager means that Redknapp has now planned his career path with the aim of taking over following the Euros.

He now has three seasons to take Spurs to the next level. He will aim to finish in the top four – at least – in the Premiership each season and make some sort of impact on the Champions League.

He has the backing of the Spurs board to do so, especially in the transfer market and Harry will look to build on his reputation by restoring glory to Tottenham, thus giving the FA no option but to appoint him England manager when Capello steps down.

Top four finishes and Champions League success, likely in the form of quarter final and semi final places, will do that, but the club will want silverware to go with it, so he must pick up the FA Cup or the League Cup at least once along the way.

In three years time it’s also possible that the biggest stumbling block to his appointment as England manager – the court case of tax evasion – will have gone away. That would leave the road clear for the FA to sign him up without fear of future complications.

I’ve already given Redknapp my backing for the job. I think he has what it takes to inspire and build confidence, though he will need a backroom staff that is more capable than he is tactically. He can also talk to the media on their level and is unlikely to follow the path of previous managers in picking teams and players based on press and public demand. Nor will he be afraid of leaving out big name players for the good of the team.

While he lacks tactical awareness right now – and I don’t mean that critically; Redknapp has only managed in England and has no real experience of facing opposition from Europe and farther afield – he will learn plenty from taking his Spurs side into the Champions League against Europe’s best.

Not only has he set out a career path he hopes will culminate in managing his country, he has a learning curve to climb and relish the challenge.

I know Redknapp is not everyone’s cup of tea and I know the negatives to appointing him England manager. In response, I will only ask who else do you think is up to the task? Because I can’t think of anyone better suited right now.

In 2013 that may be different. But for now, I wish Spurs and Redknapp well in their endeavours and I hope it works out for Harry personally and England in the future.

Who wants it now: England’s managerial contenders

If, as is widely expected, the Football Association toss several more million pounds Fabio Capello’s way along with his P45 and wish him well, they will then be faced with the daunting prospect of appointing his successor from a very short shortlist of possibilities.

Harry Redknapp

That list gets ever shorter as I expect the FA to return to English managers following the relative failures of the Italian and Sven Goran-Eriksson. They may not have that luxury should the English contenders rule themselves out, so we’d better look at a few of the other options as well.

On with the Englishmen first though.

Roy Hodgson: The Fulham manager’s stock is high right now following his success with the London club in European competition. He’s also a wanted man, with Liverpool wanting him to put them back on the right track. He has international experience with the United Arab Emirates, Finland and Switzerland, as well as working in Scandinavia and Italy at club level. In terms of knowledge and ability there are few to match Hodgson and he’d be a popular choice for the supporters as well. Where my doubts lie are in the strength of his personality – does he have the presence to command and, more importantly, motivate a team of England’s finest players? I just don’t know – but we’ll never know unless he’s given the chance.

Harry Redknapp: Harry seems to be the Marmite of football managers, you either love him or hate him. I love him (but I HATE Marmite). What he has done at club level with small clubs like Bournemouth, West Ham United and Portsmouth has been nothing short of genius and he has taken that to a bigger club in Tottenham and continued in the same fashion. As a motivator he is second to none, his ability to get the very best out of his players – no matter their level of ability – is proven. His career has progressed in such a way that if it doesn’t culminate in managing his country it will be a surprise. The FA, however, will have serious concerns about his baggage, not least the impending court case over alleged tax evasion. But what’s that got to do with football, I ask?

Stuart Pearce: Stuart, for so long a roaring Lion for England on the field, has become rather quieter off it, especially since he joined the international set up. The FA are clearly grooming him for the future and following his success with the Under 21s he joined Fabio Capello’s backroom team to learn from the master – though what he will have learned is a huge question mark now. Perhaps he learned more what NOT to do? Pearce is a student of the game and has a passion for England few can match. That combination could work – but is it too soon? Questions, you see, always questions.

Sam Allardyce: If Roy Hodgson’s stock has risen rapidly, Big Sam’s has dropped at roughly the same speed. His reputation, built at Bolton, actually had him line for the England job at one point but since leaving Bolton he’s struggled to make the same impact at Blackburn. They haven’t done badly – but they haven’t done brilliantly either, and Sam is now out of the frame. Yet he is a players’ manager, able, like Redknapp, to coax performances from average players. A useful skill for an England manager to have… The FA will only turn to Allardyce now if they have exhausted all other options, however.

It is not beyond the realms of possibility that the FA could look below the Premier League at English managers and coaches in the Championship. It’s unlikely, but not impossible. Who do we have down there that might be in with a shout then?

Well, there’s Steve Coppell at Bristol City for one. The former England international has all the credentials, is well respected and a good coach. There must be a question mark over his ability to handle the pressure of the big job though – he lasted just 33 days at Manchester City due to it. Nevertheless, his success with Reading in particular must count to his credit.

There are plenty of other good, if not great, English managers in the Premiership. But you just can’t see the FA going for them, likely through fear of both the unknown – they haven’t done it at the top level yet – and fear of a fans backlash. Despite everything, England fans will demand a big enough name. The logic is flawed, of course, but it’s human nature.

How, though, are English manager ever going to get that top level experience when Premiership clubs insist on appointing big name foreigners? Therein lies the problem. The topic was discussed on Radio 5Live last night and it was pointed out that the best sides at this year’s World Cup are managed by men of the same nationality – and that the clubs in those countries are managed by the same for the most part. Coincidence?

So what of the foreign options left open to the FA?

Arsene Wenger: Hugely respected at the FA and clearly a fantastic manager but an outside bet anyway, simply due to the fact Wenger is unlikely to want to manage England. He would no doubt be flattered to be considered, but would turn it down with grace. Whether or not he could get the best out of England’s players without the day to day contact he enjoys at Arsenal is a worry as well.

Martin O’Neill: Here we have a real man-manager who enjoys working with English players and nurturing them at Aston Villa. On paper he is the ideal candidate and he’d jump at the chance of the England job. He isn’t one for staying too long at a club so it gets stale too and I get the sense that might not be too far off with Villa. Another season or two? He’s definitely in with a shout, though apparently he didn’t impress in his last interview with the FA when they looked for a replacement for Eriksson. They’ll take another look though.

David Moyes: Another in with a shout due to his success with Everton on a shoe string. He can clearly motivate his men, his tactical ability is strong and he is a willing learner. Importantly, he is also good with the press. Whether he can handle the pressures of the England job is a debate to have but there’s nothing yet to suggest he couldn’t.

Would the FA consider a previous England manager? It is doubtful, but Steve McLaren has proved what a good manager he can be with FC Twente and one newspaper even touted Eriksson as an option! I’ll toss another name into the ring too – Glenn Hoddle. He had England playing the best football I have seen them play. It was a shame he was and still maybe a complete loon, but he suits international management in my mind.

If I had to pick one right now to replace Capello, however, I wouldn’t hesitate in choosing Harry Redknapp. England don’t need a tactical genius, they need a man who can motivate, handle the press and with enough brains to send his team out knowing the jobs they have to do. For me, Redknapp is it and right now he’s at the top of his game.

Where would your vote go?

Spurs clinch Champions League spot – what now for Man City?

In the end the better team won the match and deservedly claimed the final Champions League spot by finishing fourth in the Premier League.

Tottenham Hotspur clinch Champions League spot

Crouch goal enough to beat Man City

Tottenham Hotspur, under Harry Redknapp, have looked a quality side this season and this is just reward for their – and his – hard work. At the risk of coming over all hypocritical following yesterday’s article lambasting clubs for targeting a fourth place finish, Sporting Fare is well pleased for Spurs and Harry. And at the bigger risk of angering Manchester City supporters, we’re equally pleased they didn’t qualify for the Champions League.

Let’s get the negatives out of the way. As we said in yesterday’s piece, the fact that a club with the amount of money City have aimed only for fourth grated on us. You aim low, you get low. City, as many Manchester United fans will take great joy in telling you, consistently find a way to fail, so it beggars belief that targeting anything but the title is deemed worth the risk.

Mark Hughes was sacked because the club’s billionaire owners felt he wouldn’t take the club up to fourth. Mancini was then presumably hired to deliver just that. He’s failed – will he get the boot too? Time will tell, though it would be harsh on the Italian. At the end of the day, the squad put together by Hughes wasn’t good enough and Mancini could only work with what he had. He certainly hasn’t had enough time or opportunity to put his own mark on it.

But stop for a moment. Was the appointment of a relatively green coach in Mancini all that ambitious in itself? Surely a club with the riches of Manchester City could have attracted a bigger, more successful and more experienced manager? It smacks of settling for second best.

Spurs, on the other hand, are aiming high. Their sights are now firmly set on grabbing third from bitter rivals Arsenal and you can bet next season Harry will have his men shooting for the stars – the Premier League title and the Champions League. So let’s leave Spurs to celebrate for now.

Where does this leave City? With no Champions League football they will be hard pressed to attract football’s biggest names. No matter how much money you offer, that fact will always be a consideration – except for the real mercenaries in the game, and they are unlikely to be the sort you want to sign to help you achieve your aims (see Robinho for example).

Spurs will now have the money – and the appeal – to strengthen their squad. Manchester United, Arsenal and without doubt Chelsea will all add players after the World Cup to increase their grip on the top three spots. City will find it difficult to match them in the transfer market.

Yes, they will no doubt spend big again in the summer but will the quality of players they are able to bring in be good enough to overhaul the likes of Tottenham et al? The evidence so far suggests not and they are going to find it more and more difficult each season.

Their Arab owners may begin to question the wisdom of their investment as well and if they decide to pull out City will find themselves sliding to the wrong end of the table.

Last night’s result was a bitter blow for a club aiming to become one of England and Europe’s best – but we can’t help feeling they didn’t aim high enough when it mattered. They will pay a heavy price for that lack of ambition. Around £200m so far and counting in fact. It may take another £200m based on what we’ve seen this season.

Back to Harry Redknapp. Sporting Fare are huge fans of his. It’s great to see an ‘old school’ manager doing well and Harry, at 62, has waited a long time to pit his not inconsiderable managerial skills against the best in Europe.  As he said himself:

“I know I’m good at my job. You don’t last 1,100 games in management if you’re a mug. People didn’t keep me just because the chairman liked me. Most of them actually probably didn’t like me.”

Harry Redknapp

Thumbs up for Redknapp

Very true, and many don’t like him. But you can’t dismiss his achievements. We’re looking forward to seeing how he does in the Champions League.

Redknapp, along with Wenger, Ferguson and Hodgson, is a good example to young up and coming managers. Managers like Mancini for example. They would do well take note of how these managers go about their business, there’s a lot to learn.

Not least that if you don’t aim for the very top you’ll never reach it.

Battle for fourth is a sad state of affairs

Remember when you were a kid, kicking a ball about with your mates on the park, using jumpers for goalposts, playing fly keeper if you were a few ‘men’ short and not worrying too much about sidelines? Of course you do.

Remember pretending to be your footballing hero and dreaming of lifting the FA Cup or the First Division title? Of course you do.

Remember thinking you weren’t quite good enough for that, but were happily consoled by the fact you’d probably finish fourth in the League and claim a lucrative place in the European Cup? Of course you don’t!

Manchester City v Spurs

Aim higher or prepare to fail!

Yet as Manchester City prepare to face Tottenham Hotspur at home tonight in what is effectively a play off for that now coveted fourth spot the anticipation and excitement is palpable amongst both sets of fans. Sporting Fare sees that as the most telling sign that football has lost its way.

That a fourth place finish in the Premier League is a target for clubs is a horrible situation. That the only real reason for it is money is even more horrible. Sure, the supporters of whichever club finishes fourth will tell you there is pride in breaking the near decade long monopoly held by Manchester United, Arsenal, Liverpool and Chelsea, but that isn’t really true.

Everton did it most recently, for one brief season. They entered the Champions League qualifying round, earned a small fortune and, presumably, basked in the glory of it all briefly. But in the end, it hasn’t actually helped them progress. David Moyes has done a wonderful job at Goodison and long may he reign there, but surely the target has to be winning the League, not just qualifying for the Champions League and earning a mint?

The argument, we’re sure, will go that most clubs cannot compete with the financial might of Chelsea and to a lesser extent Manchester United and that is undoubtedly true. But that shouldn’t stop you trying! And if, at the end of a long hard season, you HAVE qualified for the Champions League and are set to earn a wedge that may help you compete better the following season then that’s the icing.

It shouldn’t be the cake.

Manchester City, of course, don’t need Champions League qualification for money. They are the richest club in the world and suffer in the transfer market only due to their lack of success over the last few decades. The ability to offer Champions League football next season will help them no end in that regard. Yet they have publicly stated that this was their aim from the start of the season. What, that’s it?

The richest club in the world is aiming to finish fourth in their league? What’s up with that? They, like everyone else, should be going for the title, even if it does appear out of reach.

We’re willing to bet that if you asked Harry Redknapp, who himself has done a fantastic job at White Hart Lane, if finishing fourth was his target he’d say no. He’d say winning the League was his target – but it’s a building job, and while he may not think it’s likely, it will be his aim, because you have to aim high to achieve.

Fourth place and July football in the Champions League is not, in our opinion, high. It’s adequate. The very reason that Manchester United, Arsenal, Chelsea and Liverpool have been the top four for so long is that they all aim to win the League (and the Champions League). None of them would have been or are satisfied with fourth.

Except, of course, Liverpool recently. And look what’s happened to them.

So…as City and Spurs do battle tonight for that less than impressive achievement we hope they begin to realise that you need to aim higher to achieve real success. Settle for second best (or fourth best) and that is all you’re ever likely to get.